Comments for SimonDixon.Org

Comment on Contact Simon by Simon Williams

Simon Williams — Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:48:23 +0000

Hi Simon

Really enjoyed your presentation today.
Didn’t get chance to speak to your colleague regarding connections to Universities – I actually help Post-Grad students with their Thesis, at Middlesex University – so have good link there.

Let me know what you need from the University – and I will let you know if I can help hook you up.

Thanks
Simon

Comment on Home by admin

admin — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:05:03 +0000

Hi Greg,

I suggest attending one of my free webinars by visiting

http;//www.benedix.co.uk/simon-dixon-webinar

We can then see if we can work together.

Simon

Comment on Home by Greg

Greg — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:27:37 +0000

Hi Simon,
I am a Maths graduate from a top 10 UK university and worked for 6 months temping in banking financial support but left for a permanent job in the public sector. I graduated in 2002. I really want to get back into banking but I’m not sure if my CV will be strong enough. Can you offer any advise on how best to change career to get into this sector? or if this change is unrealistic now? I’m currently interested in Banking operations.

Comment on Home by simondixon

simondixon — Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:03:30 +0000

No that is really not the message.

The bank of England should be in charge of creating our money supply directly rather than indirectly through interest rates. This money supply should be debt free.

The banking system is a capitalist competitive banking system that puts together borrowers and lenders with interest as the incentive.

But they only lend real money rather than privately created money.

That’s it.

Not anti capitalist or anti banking or anti interest.

Just see the need for sustainable economics.

Simon.

Comment on Home by Anuj Sachdev

Anuj Sachdev — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:15:03 +0000

Hi Simon,
This is the first time that I watched your video about monetary reform.

Are you suggesting that there be only one bank i.e. the central bank and that too should not charge interest on money lent? If so, then wouldn’t the extinction of the banking industry result in a severe contraction as it is this current large network of banks responsible for introducing money in every corner of every single economy.

If interest charges go out of the equation then no entity would like to call itself a bank which will lead to lesser number or none banks at all. In such a situation who will give money to the public? Is a central bank capable of giving money directly to every single person of an economy?

Are you suggesting a closure of the banking industry?

Comment on Home by Nonye Ndekwu

Nonye Ndekwu — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:05:16 +0000

You are an inspiration!I am an avid reader of your blog!keep up the amazing work!

Comment on Home by Sami Abdi

Sami Abdi — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:31:32 +0000

Excellent work Simon!

Keep it up.

Sami

Comment on Home by jonathan

jonathan — Tue, 18 May 2010 18:38:21 +0000

yeah Simon..it’s all very beautiful..but don’t you think we should just crash the whole system and start again?

hmmm?

jonathan

Comment on Monetary Reform is not a conspiracy theory by cifix

cifix — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:01:22 +0000

I wish you were right… but Qui bono? Who prospers from the system? Who has installed the system, who has profit?
Of course monetary reform is not a conspiracy theory. But what seems to be at least questionable is – was the debt system installed by design rather then by a mistake? Examples – How FED was installed in 1913 by Wilson (who later confessed – I was deceived by bankers), how Rooswelt confiscated US gold to get dollar out of binding etc… so there are steps (by bankers) to clear the way for unlimited debt expansion (did not Bernanke recently said to abolish reserves at all?)
Well you are closer to source then me, so you consider this.
I appreciate your effort and hope although it to be (conspiracy or mistakes), the change would come. The monetary reform is necessary.

Comment on Home by Anon

Anon — Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:47:26 +0000

Some background info. I read engineering at a Russell Group uni some 13 years ago. Have been in a high tech industry since. I’ve done very well, rising up to C-level. Lately, I’ve grown disillusioned with the direction the industry’s heading and am contemplating a career change.

I’m not keen to pursue an MBA at this stage. Instead, I went ahead and took some short courses, e.g. the AAT accounting levels (to get an appreciation of accounting) and also CISI’s Foundation course. I found these interesting – enjoyable even.

I’d be interested to know your thoughts on entering the banking/finance industry while in my thirties. Is it considered “too old” to do trading? Doing research/analysis in the industry I know well is a possibility, but would it be better to just do an MBA then?

Thanks.